WEKO3
アイテム
Differences between acoustic trauma and other types of acute noise-induced hearing loss in terms of treatment and hearing prognosis
http://hdl.handle.net/2241/00146726
http://hdl.handle.net/2241/001467264295703f-7d99-4e4e-adb4-aafb4b579205
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
AOL_137-S565-S48.pdf (1.1 MB)
|
Item type | Journal Article(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2017-07-05 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | Differences between acoustic trauma and other types of acute noise-induced hearing loss in terms of treatment and hearing prognosis | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | eng | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | journal article | |||||
アクセス権 | ||||||
アクセス権 | open access | |||||
アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||
著者 |
和田, 哲郎
× 和田, 哲郎× Sano, Hajime× Nishio, Shin-ya× Kitoh, Ryosuke× Ikezono, Tetsuo× Iwasaki, Satoshi× Kaga, Kimitaka× Matsubara, Atsushi× Matsunaga, Tatsuo× Murata, Takaaki× Naito, Yasushi× Suzuki, Mikio× Takahashi, Haruo× Tono, Testuya× Yamashita, Hiroshi× 原, 晃× Usami, Shin-ichi |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | Objectives: To evaluate the differences between acoustic trauma (AT) and other types of acute noise-induced hearing loss (ANIHL), we performed a literature search and case reviews. Methods: The literature search based on online databases was completed in September 2016. Articles on ANIHL and steroid treatment for human subjects were reviewed. The source sounds and treatment sequelae of our accumulated cases were also reviewed. Hearing loss caused by gun-shots and explosions was categorized into the AT group, while hearing loss caused by concerts and other noises was categorized into the ANIHL group. Results: Systemic steroid treatment did not appear to be effective, at least in the AT group, based on both the literature and our case reviews. However, effective recovery after treatment including steroids was observed in the ANIHL group. The difference in hearing recovery between the AT and ANIHL groups was statistically significant (p?=?.030), although differences in age, days from the onset to treatment and pretreatment hearing levels were not significant. Conclusions: Hearing recovery from AT is very poor, whereas, ANIHL is recoverable to some extent. Therefore, it is essential to differentiate between these two groups for accurate prediction of the hearing prognosis and evaluation of treatment effects. | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
書誌情報 |
en : Acta oto-laryngologica 巻 137, 号 sup565, p. S48-S52, 発行日 2017 |
|||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 0001-6489 | |||||
NCID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AA0050923X | |||||
DOI | ||||||
関連タイプ | isIdenticalTo | |||||
識別子タイプ | DOI | |||||
関連識別子 | https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2017.1297899 | |||||
PMID | ||||||
識別子タイプ | PMID | |||||
関連識別子 | 28394667 | |||||
権利情報 | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
権利情報 | © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group | |||||
権利情報 | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
権利情報 | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. | |||||
出版タイプ | ||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | Taylor & Francis | |||||
言語 | en |